AstraZeneca Withdraws Zactima from Consideration of FDA Approval for Advanced NSCLC


   AstraZeneca (AZ) just issued a press release noting that they are withdrawing their application for the “multi-kinase inhibitor” Zactima (vandetanib) to receive FDA approval to be given along with chemo in advanced NSCLC right now.  Zactima is a pill that has the potential to block both the EGFR and VEGF (angiogenic) pathway, and I’ve described some of the larger clinical trials being pursued by AstraZeneca with Zactima in a prior post.   I also covered the more complete presentations of the data earlier this year and why I felt that the benefits of Zactima appeared quite underwhelming, while member and GRACE board member Neil Berch made an argument favoring a meaningful benefit with Zactima.  

     Several months ago, AZ had filed an application with the FDA for approval of Zactima along with chemo, based on the modestly positive results of the ZODIAC and ZEAL trials.  Though I don’t know any back story, I presume the signals that they were getting were primarily that there were more people underwhelmed than impressed by these results, because they’ve withdrawn that application now.

   One of the conlcusions that Neil and I agreed on was that it would be important and helpful to see a survival benefit in the ZEPHYR trial, which compares Zactima to placebo in patients with advanced NSCLC who have previously received an oral EGFR inhibitor.  The results of that trial are anticipated to be released in the next several months, so AZ may be prioritizing its efforts and resources for Zactima by channeling them toward a campaign as a single agent therapy rather than combined with chemo. 

   I look forward to learning the results of the ZEPHYR trial, and we’ll definitely discuss them when they become available.

Related posts:

    Do We Exhaust the Benefit of a Chemo After Four Cycles of First Line Chemo for Advanced NSCLC? One of the longstanding ideas in lung cancer management is that you exhaust the benefi...

    Beyond XALKORI for ALK-Positive NSCLC: More Evidence of Alimta’s Activity The marker known as an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation has been al...

    ASCO vs. NCCN: Very Different Views on Molecular Testing in Advanced NSCLC A couple of weeks ago, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) release...

    ALK inhibitor XALKORI (Crizotinib) FDA-Approved: New Era, with New Challenges Yesterday afternoon, the FDA approved the ALK inhibitor crizotinib, newly christene...

    New Hope for EGFR Mutant NSCLC with Acquired Resistance to Tarceva (including T790M!) I am sorry to say that there were few surprises or earth-shatteringly positive result...

Posted in: Lung Cancer, Multikinase inhibitors, Second-line treatment, Stage IV/Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC, Third-line therapy and beyond

2 Comments  

neilb
Posted on October 28, 2009 at 10:09 am

Since we disagreed in the earlier discussion, I will simply say that I agree with all of what Dr. West says above. It all comes down to the ZPEHYR trial (anyone want to bet that the results of that trial will be indeterminate?!).–Neil


zhufumama
Posted on October 28, 2009 at 10:13 am

Thank you Dr. West for the information. I have been following this drug since last year and agree that it would be important and helpful to see a survival benefit in the ZEPHYR trial. Thanks again for the update.