GRACE :: Lung Cancer

Search cancerGRACE.org

Dr West

New Agents for Acquired Resistance in EGFR Mutation-Positive Patients: C01686 and AZD9291

Share
download as a pdf file Download PDF of this page

Since the introduction of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients with lung cancer, we have seen a subset of patients do remarkably well, with dramatic and long lasting responses. Unfortunately, within a few months of those impressive responses, we learned that people invariably develop acquired resistance to these agents.  Over the past period of more than a decade, lab-based scientists, oncologists, and of course patients have been eagerly seeking treatments that can lead to promising responses again in patients who have developed acquired resistance.  A couple of new agents show promise that we haven’t seen before in this setting, and they are now the subject of emerging clinical trials that show the promise of breaking an impasse that has existed for more than a decade.

The first of the two I’d like to highlight is CO1686, from Clovis. This “third generation” oral irreversible EGFR inhibitor effectively blocks not only activating mutations but the most common mechanism of resistance, the T790M mutation that is detected in about 60% of tumors that demonstrate acquired resistance after a response. It also has the potential advantage of not inhibiting “wild-type” (non-mutated) EGFR at the typical doses used, which means that it doesn’t cause the same severity of rash and diarrhea that the EGFR inhibitors we’ve had available thus far produce.

Though CO1686 is still early in testing, Dr. Jean-Charles Soria recently said that 6 of 9 patients with a  T790M mutation-positive cancer demonstrated a significant response at the newly established phase II dose of 900 mg by mouth twice daily, and with no rash.  Though still obviously still in early stages of development, the early promise of two-thirds of the patients in the target group responding is leading to multiple new trials, including

  • A phase II/III study comparing CO1686 head to head against Tarceva (erlotinib) in newly diagnosed patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is EGFR mutation-positive
  • A phase II trial of Co-1686 in T790M-positive patients after progression on one prior EGFR TKI
  • Another phase II trial of T790M-positive patients after progression on >1 EGFR TKI or chemotherapy
  • A phase II trial of 2nd line or later CO1686 for patients who have a T790M mutation detected by a serum assay; and
  • A phase III randomized trial vs. chemotherapy in second line or later.  

Clearly, this reflects a major investment and a lot of optimism in this agent.

A second agent that has shown similar promise is AZD9291, another third generation EGFR inhibitor with essentially the same mechanism of action.  Dr. Malcolm Ranson and colleagues reported on results from an 89 patient trial of patients with an activating EGFR mutation and acquired resistance, though this study allowed patients with either a T790M mutation or not.   The study included testing of the drug at a wide range of doses, from 20-240 mg/day, with no dose reductions required, and almost exclusively mild (grade 1 of 4) rash and diarrhea seen.  What was especially encouraging was that 15 of 35 evaluable patients had a response, including 9 of 18 with a T790M mutation. The follow-up plans for this agent are still being defined, but there is a lot of excitement about this agent as well.

Though we’re talking only about a few dozen patients and still learning about these agents, I’ve never been as optimistic about breaking through the impasse of acquired resistance in EGFR mutation-positive patients.  I hope to share more information about these agents and perhaps others very soon.


4 Responses to New Agents for Acquired Resistance in EGFR Mutation-Positive Patients: C01686 and AZD9291

  • tracey59 says:

    Dear Dr. West:

    This is great news indeed, particularly for patients like me, who has developed acquired resistance to Tarceva.

    BTW, I have read a report about antioxidant may cause further progression of (lung) cancer. Does it mean that we cancer patients should NOT take extra antioxidants, including not drinking too much lemon water? I would be very grateful-I think many cancer patients would feel the same- for your advice.

    Best wishes,

    Tracey

  • Dr West
    Dr West says:

    We really can’t and don’t want to say what people should or should not do — that’s medical advice, and that should be between you and your doctors. There is definitely reason for some concern that anti-oxidants may be counterproductive for cancer patients.

    -Dr. West

  • costica says:

    Thanks for bringing great news! Or at least some hope.

    For CO-1686, the results you mention are from NCT01526928? I saw it had an estimated enrollment of 170, thus I’m surprised that only 9 patients had T790.

  • Dr West
    Dr West says:

    These were very preliminary results of an ongoing trial.

Leave a Reply

Ask Us, Q&A
Lung/Thoracic Cancer Expert Content

Archives

Share
download as a pdf file Download PDF of this page

GRACE Cancer Video Library - Lung Cancer Videos

 

2015_Immunotherapy_Forum_Videos

 

2015 Acquired Resistance in Lung Cancer Patient Forum Videos

Share
download as a pdf file Download PDF of this page

Join the GRACE Faculty

Breast Cancer Blog
Pancreatic Cancer Blog
Kidney Cancer Blog
Bladder Cancer Blog
Head/Neck Cancer Blog
Share
download as a pdf file Download PDF of this page

Subscribe to the GRACEcast Podcast on iTunes

Share
download as a pdf file Download PDF of this page

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon

Subscribe to
GRACE Notes
   (Free Newsletter)

Other Resources

Share
download as a pdf file Download PDF of this page

ClinicalTrials.gov


Biomedical Learning Institute

peerview_institute_logo_243