My name is Robert Resta, and I’m a certified genetic counselor working at the Hereditary Cancer Clinic at Swedish Cancer Institute in Seattle. Dr. West asked me if I might provide a few general comments about the genetic contribution of lung cancer.
In truth, this is a complicated question. There is little doubt that […]
Radon is a product of the decay of naturally occuring uranium in the earth, and it’s estimated to be responsible for perhaps 2-3% of lung cancers overall. In one reference (here) doesn’t offer any details of where the numbers come from, an estimated 26% of lung cancer in never-smokers is caused by radon:
(Click on […]
0 CommentsIt has been noted for many years that Asian women appear to be particularly predisposed to lung cancer despite a low frequency of smoking. Many of the series from resected NSCLC series have never-smoker rates of 30-50%, with the majority of these never-smokers as women. As we’ve struggled to understand and explain risks, hormonal […]
5 CommentsAmong the key issues in following patients with a history of treated lung cancer is the pattern of recurrence. We need to have a sense of when the risk is highest and where people are more likely to demonstrate new evidence of disease. Fortunately, there are several studies that can help us with these […]
4 CommentsOne of the more interesting websites that has some interesting tools for making cancer-related predictions is nomograms.org, part of the website for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. A nomogram is similar to the venerable slide rule, the old calculating device, but the important thing to know is that it allows for people to either use a pencil and […]
3 CommentsMany members have asked questions about increased risk of lung cancer among family members of people who have developed lung cancer. Overall, I have not highlighted this, partly because we don’t tend to highlight genetics as a major contributor of lung cancer risk. But the fact is that 10-15% of people who develop lung […]
12 CommentsIn light of a growing focus on the issue of lung cancer in never-smokers, it makes sense to try to identify potential causes in this population. Among the leading candidates as a cause of lung cancer in never-smokers is secondhand, or environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure. This potential cause was identified more than 25 years […]
2 CommentsIn addition to risk for having a recurrence of a lung cancer that has been surgically removed, patients with a history of early NSCLC are also at risk for a second primary (unrelated to the first) lung cancer. In other words, having had a lung cancer, even if it was cured, means that a person remains […]
3 Comments