GRACE :: Lung Cancer

Unresectable locally advanced NSCLC

Options and controversy around management options for unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC

Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer, Part 1: Podcast by Dr. Govindan on MAGE-A3, Stimuvax, and Lucanix

Share

Here’s part 1 of the podcast with Dr. Ramaswamy Govindan from Washington University, in St. Louis, and Dr. Julie Brahmer from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, splitting the big topic of new developments in immunotherapy for lung cancer. Though the field has a lot of intuitive appeal, harnessing the body’s own immune system to fight cancer with the hope of sustained effect and a very mild side effect profile, proven benefits of immunotherapy in cancer have been slow to come.  But in the last few years, we’ve seen new treatments with impressive survival benefits in prostate cancer, melanoma, and others…while in lung cancer, the key studies are being conducted but have yet to report out.

Dr. Govindan covered the big topics of MAGE-A3, Stimuvax, and Lucanix in his part of the program.  The audio and video versions of the podcast are below, along with the transcript and figures.

Govindan Immunotherapies in LC Part 1 Audio Podcast

Govindan Immunotherapies for LC Part 1 Transcript

Govindan Immunotherapies in LC Part 1 Figs

 

Continue reading


Global differences: Shouldn’t every curable patient have the right to the best treatment?

Share

One of the things we learn when studying the clinical research in lung cancer is that “global studies” often include patients with locally advanced (stage III) NSCLC along with those who have advanced (stage IV) NSCLC. Part of the confusion has been the ungainly status of stage IIIB NSCLC with a malignant pleural effusion — historically termed “wet IIIB disease” — in the IIIB camp but not having the curability of patients with “dry IIIB disease” –unresectable locally advanced NSCLC without a malignant pleural effusion. But while North American (at least US) trials over the past 10-15 years that are meant for patients with incurable advanced NSCLC have nearly always included only patients with wet stage IIIB disease (now moved to stage IV in the newest and most accurate lung cancer staging system) and stage IV NSCLC, trials done in other parts of the world, and especially in Europe, have often allowed patients with unresectable dry stage III NSCLC to be included as well. In their trials, patients with stage III NSCLC typically comprise only about 10-15% of the overall trial population, but I must confess that I’ve gone from just shrugging my shoulders and saying to myself, “I guess that’s how they do it”, to a perspective where I’m more inclined to articulate that this is inappropriate and objectionable, for two reasons.

Continue reading


Less is More: High Dose Radiation Not Better When Given Concurrent with Chemo for Locally Advanced NSCLC

Share

lucy_football Like Charlie Brown always thinking that this time will be different when he tries to kick the football without Lucy pulling it away, we get lulled into thinking that we know the intuitive, obvious answer in medicine without really testing it, only to find that our assumption was wrong yet again. This time, the important new result comes from the annual meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO), which is just ending in Miami. There, investigators from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) released some important early results from a study, RTOG 0617, that will impact the way stage III (locally advanced) NSCLC is managed.

While in many older studies the dose of radiation was in the 60-61 Gray (Gy) range (Gy being the units of radiation dose) over 6-6.5 weeks, there has been a drift in routine practice to often higher doses, to 63-66 Gy pretty routinely and even up to 70-74 Gy in some places, and not just in clinical trials. This isn’t really based on the proven value of a higher dose over a lower dose, but rather based on the concept that the 60-61 Gy level wasn’t found to be the clear best dose in the past, but rather was what was considered to be more or less safe and feasible at the time, while there is really a dose-response effect beyond that. Then, over the past 10-15 years, certain centers have done research using more refined radiation techniques to deliver chest radiation up to doses in the range of 74 Gy or even higher, with concurrent chemotherapy. Since then, more and more radiation oncologists have followed, using conformal radiation techniques to routinely push what is perceived as a “standard dose” of chest radiation with concurrent chemotherapy, as many of us in the field came to view radiation to 60-61 Gy as potential under-dosing of treatment for concurrent chemoradiation today.

Continue reading


Challenging Cases Podcast: Unresectable Stage IIIB NSCLC

Share

Here’s another case in the recording I did with Drs. Jyoti Patel from Northwestern and Bob Doebele from University of Colorado, discussing a series of perplexing cases in lung cancer management, then combining their comments with the responses from several other terrific experts (Drs. Suresh Ramalingam, Jonathan Goldman, Julie Brahmer, Heather Wakelee, and Karen Reckamp) about the same case. From each one, you can get a sense of the variability in how different lung cancer experts share the same set of data but have their own interpretation and style for cases where there are significant gaps in what the data tell us.

This particular case is one we struggle with all the time, and one for which many people have asked questions here. Once someone with unresectable stage III NSCLC has completed initial chemo/radiation, typically over an approximately seven week period, should we recommend any additional treatment after that. We are generally tempted to do so, in hopes of providing better results than what we might expect without it, but we don’t have evidence that it helps. I think you’ll get a clear sense of the uncertainty (at least mine), but several of the speakers also note their different mindset for those patients treated with weekly carbo/Taxol (paclitaxel) (which we believe doesn’t give meaningful systemic dosing to eradicate micrometastatic disease, but it can help make the radiation given concurrently more effective) versus “full dose” cisplatin/etoposide (which we feel does treat possible distant disease in addition to helping make the radiation more effective where it is directed).

So here’s the audio and video versions of the podcast, along with the transcript and figures from the presentation.

grace-cases-stage-iiib-nsclc-chemort-and-consolidation-q-audio-podcast

grace-cases-stage-iiib-nsclc-chemort-and-consolidation-q-transcript

grace-cases-stage-iiib-nsclc-chemort-and-consolidation-q-figures

Continue reading


When Do Recurrences of Lung Cancer Happen After Surgery?

Share

The answer is, “Usually pretty early”. I tell my patients that the risk is “front-loaded”, meaning that we typically see recurrences occur in the first couple of years after curative therapy for lung cancer, if they’re going to happen at all. That said, I haven’t seen a lot of data that actually illustrates the point, but there was a presentation at ASCO this past year that addressed how well recurrences/disease-free survival predict overall survival after surgery for resectable NSCLC. Not surprisingly, there was a very good correlation, though it wasn’t perfect (patients can die from side effects of the treatment, or from unrelated but competing medical problems).

In the process of reviewing the data from two “meta-analyses” of multiple smaller studies of chemotherapy after surgery, either with or without radiation also administered, a group led by Dr. Michiels from Institute Gustave-Roussy in Villejuif, France reported on the “lead time” that diseease-free survival gives in predicting overall survival. They found that, if recurrences were going to ever happen, about 50% occurred within the first year, at least two-thirds within two years, and about 80% or more within three years.

time-to-recurrence-in-early-stage-nsclc (click on image to enlarge)

Continue reading


Ask Us, Q&A
Lung/Thoracic Cancer Expert Content

Archives

Share

Lung Cancer Awareness Month Information

 


GRACE Website Rebuild

Share

Acquired Resistance Forum Videos

 

ALK+ Lung Cancer Patient Forum Videos

Share

Join the GRACE Faculty

Breast Cancer Blog
Pancreatic Cancer Blog
Kidney Cancer Blog
Bladder Cancer Blog
Head/Neck Cancer Blog
Share

Subscribe to the GRACEcast Podcast on iTunes

Share

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon

Subscribe to
GRACE Notes
   (Free Newsletter)

Other Resources

Share

ClinicalTrials.gov


Biomedical Learning Institute

PeerView Press - Curriculum-Based Learning Activities