Assessing the "flight risk" of a lung cancer: Why we care so much about lymph nodes
Why do we care about lymph nodes when staging lung cancer?
If you have been NEWLY DIAGNOSED START HERE
Radiation therapy can be very helpful in treating painful bone metastases or those at risk for causing a fracture due to compromise of bone strength...
Radiation Oncologist Dr. Vivek Mehta reviews the concept of using whole brain radiation for multiple brain metastases, including how it is delivered...
When I met my first lung cancer patient in medical school, I found it difficult to grasp the wording of the diagnosis non-small cell lung cancer (and...
We've recently received a series of questions on the question of whether it makes sense to give an oral EGFR inhibitor like Tarceva (erlotinib) or...
One of the most common questions. we receive is why people are told that surgery isn't an appropriate option for metastatic disease. If you can see...
When I was a medical student, the question about lung cancer that was always asked on "the Boards" had to do with the difference between stage IIIA...
Here is the third and final case I discussed with two great experts in locally advanced NSCLC. Drs. George Blumenschein, medical oncologist from MD...
Why do we care about lymph nodes when staging lung cancer?
The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has been working on a large randomized trial in patients with stage III, locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC that asked two key questions:
1) is the best dose of radiation the "old" standard of 60 Gray (Gy), over about 6 weeks, or a higher dose of 74 Gy that has been found to be feasible?
2) Is there a value in adding weekly Erbitux (cetuximab), the antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), along with weekly carboplatin/Taxol (paclitaxel) and concurrent chest radiation therapy (RT)?
I've mentioned in posts in the past about the settings in which local therapy might be appropriate for someone even when we know the cancer is advanced/metastatic. Here's a brief video that discusses some of these issues, including a situation in which the local treatment isn't specifically aimed at addressing a symptom, as is the usual reason for treating with local therapy for metastatic cancer, but is rather what I'd consider the "Get the Lead Runner" strategy:
[powerpress]
I'm interested in your thoughts.
For non-small cell lung cancer patients with multiple brain metastases, the standard approach of whole brain radiotherapy is not necessarily standard for each and every patient. Each patient's specific situation may sometimes be best approached with various combinations of surgery, radiation, medical/systemic therapy, and non-cancer directed treatment.
When I met my first lung cancer patient in medical school, I found it difficult to grasp the wording of the diagnosis non-small cell lung cancer (and its associated acronym, NSCLC). Why was the diagnosis named so specifically for what it is not, rather than what it is?
We've recently received a series of questions on the question of whether it makes sense to give an oral EGFR inhibitor like Tarceva (erlotinib) or Iressa (gefitinib) concurrently with radiation. This is really a poorly studied question, but a paper just published in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology describes a clinical trial that helps to address this question.
Copyright © 2021 Global Resource for Advancing Cancer Education
Site by Freelock