My wife was diagnosed with Stage IV NSCLC four months ago, and has been on Tarceva. Next week we will find out how the targeted chemotherapy is working. Naturally, we pray for a good news, but we want to prepare for alternative outcomes. We live in a small town, and are under the care of a local cancer center. If our doctor proposes a second-line treatment, how do we determine if it is the BEST "next step?" With the hundreds of articles and studies and trials, (some current, some out-of-date) how do we sort through them to choose the BEST new promising therapy? How do we access an expert opinion for my wife's specific case? Do we schedule a corroborating "second opinion" from an expert at a major cancer hospital? And how do we choose the best place to seek a second opinion or a course of treatment...by reputation, by survival statistics? How do people facing these crucial decisions choose the best "next step?"
How to choose "next step?" - 1272003
rsh552
Posts:4
Forums
Reply # - December 4, 2015, 04:13 AM
Hi Ron,
Hi Ron,
Welcome to GRACE. I am sorry to hear of your wife's diagnosis, and I hope that she gets great results from her upcoming scan.
Though all of us who have dealt with a lung cancer diagnosis have felt just as you have, that we want to find the best option for our loved one at any given point in his/her cancer fight, there isn't any one course of action that we can be certain is best. We just need to gather as much information as possible in order to be in the best position to make a good choice. Although targeted therapies have made some of these decisions a bit easier, narrowing some of the initial options, at times a choice must be made from the most promising of those options.
I think a second opinion at a major cancer center, preferably one affiliated as a teaching hospital for a good medical school. The doctors at such facilities tend to be the best-informed regarding the latest research and clinical trials. Survival statistics may not be the best indicator, since they may attract more patients with complex situations who do not fare as well as others.
Good luck with the scan.
JimC
Forum moderator
Reply # - December 4, 2015, 10:39 AM
Hi Ron, Welcome to Grace. I
Hi Ron, Welcome to Grace. I'm very sorry your wife is going through this, though by your questioning I gather she is lucky you are there with her. I've found this blog post to be excellent for anyone especially those already considering a 2nd opinion. It puts the question of why into perspective.
http://cancergrace.org/cancer-101/2011/11/13/an-insider%E2%80%99s-guide…
As for 2nd line treatments, immunotherapy is just FDA approved for treatment but possibly only after chem doublet like carbo/alimta. But I hope she does very well on tarceva for a long long time.
All the very best,
Janine
Reply # - December 6, 2015, 01:38 PM
Ron, I wanted to add (since I
Ron, I wanted to add (since I suggested next steps) is that if tarceva is ineffectual that it's possibly because of an inherited T790M. a mutation that is often the cause for resistance to tarceva. Usually people acquire the extra mutation while taking tarceva called acquired resistance but a very small percentage of people have it from birth. So if tarceva doesn't work an option may be to test for the T790 mutation, if positive the 3 generation egfr tki may be appropriate.
Reply # - December 6, 2015, 06:50 PM
Odds are that the scans will
Odds are that the scans will be excellent. If something unclear or unexpected is found, then referral for a second opinion is reasonable. I would choose a major academic cancer center within convenient traveling distance for you. Sometimes it is helpful to just have an extra physician just to help put everything in context for you. Most oncologists understand that their patients like to learn about their condition from multiple doctors, it is not offensive. In fact, in my experience, most actually appreciate it, because it off-loads some of the burden of answering complicated questions from their busy appointments. Hope this helps.
Reply # - December 21, 2015, 03:20 PM
Jim, Janine and Dr. Ben:
Jim, Janine and Dr. Ben:
Thank you for your responses and your encouraging words. The results of my wife's tests were very positive; the Tarceva is working, and the tumors have noticeably shrunk. We hope, as Janine suggests, that the Tarceva continues working for a long long time.
Thank you all for your contributions to this website. It is such a comfort to have such caring and generous people to turn to!
- Ron -
Reply # - December 21, 2015, 07:01 PM
Ron, A few months back, Dr.
Ron, A few months back, Dr. West created a decision tree of paths to follow. That was before approval of immunotherapy treatment. Maybe Jim and Janine can point you toward finding that decision tree.