Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

Chief of Hematology/Oncology and Medical Director at Memorial Cancer Institute, and Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Florida International University

Chief of Hematology/Oncology
Medical Director of Memorial Cancer Institute

Lung Cancer Video Library - Spanish Language: Video #33 Current Standards and Leading Options for First-line Treatment of EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC
Author
Luis Raez, MD FACP FCCP
 
 

Estándares actuales y opciones líderes para el tratamiento de primera línea de una mutación positiva del receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico (EGFR) en cáncer pulmonar de células no pequeñas.

 Current standards and leading options in first line treatment for a positive mutation in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer

 Dr. Luis Raez, MD FACP FCCP

Chief of Hematology/Oncology and Medical Director, Memorial Cancer Institute,
Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Florida International University

 

Spanish TRANSCRIPT

¿Cuál es el estándar o cuál es el tratamiento convencional para pacientes que tienen mutaciones EGFR? Eso creo que todos lo sabemos muy bien, porque hace 5 años que lo hacemos. Tenemos la suerte que cuando tenemos un paciente con mutaciones EGFR también tenemos tres o cuatro fármacos aprobados.

La primera es gefitinib, la segunda erlotinib, la tercera es afatinib, y hay países asiáticos que tienen icomatinib. Hay obviamente muchos más inhibidores de las tirosinas cinasa que están en desarrollo en muchos países. Pero en general estos son los agentes que tenemos, muchas veces la elección de estos agentes depende de la tradición. Por ejemplo, en el hemisferio oeste del mundo (Europa y Norte América), el único fármaco disponible era erlotinib y la mayoría de gente usa esta. En Asia, en 23-24 países gefitinib ha estado disponible por muchos años y están acostumbrados a hacer eso. Los mismo con icomatinib que se desarrolló en China e India. 

Muchas veces la elección de la droga depende de lo que uno está acostumbrado a hacer. Hay muy pocos estudios, solamente hay uno en carcinoma de células epidermoide que prueba que un fármaco puede ser mejor que otro. En el caso de afatinib contra erlotinib que hay un mejor beneficio con afatinib. En general también depende mucho de la compañía de seguros y otros factores para ver que agente se va a usar.

También la toxicidad es diferente, algunos de ellos son menos tóxicos que otros. Me refiero por ejemplo a las erupciones de la piel y a las diarreas. En general, las drogas más potentes como afatinib, que son inhibidores irreversibles de la tirosina cinasa, tienden a dar más diarreas y erupciones por lo que muchos médicos piensan que son mejores y las usan. Y hay otros médicos que piensan que no y no los usan porque también recuerden que hay pacientes mayores que de repente no van a tolerar las erupciones y la diarrea, por lo que tenemos que usar la toxicidad para ver que fármacos se van a usar en cada caso.


 

English TRANSCRIPT

What is the standard treatment for patients with EGFR mutations? I think we all know it pretty well because we’ve been doing it for 5 years. We have been lucky to have patients with EGFR mutations and also have 3 to 4 approved drugs.

The first one is gefitinib, the second is erlotinib, the third one is afatinib, and in Asian countries they have icomatinib. There are obviously more tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are being developed in many countries. But in general, these agents are sometimes selected because of tradition. For example, in the western hemisphere (Europe and North America), the only approved drug was erlotinib, so most people use it. In 23-24 countries in Asia, they have been using gefitinib for many years and they are used to their reaction. The same with icomatinib that was developed in China and India.

Many times, the drug of choice depends on what the patient is used to. There are few trials, only one in epidermal cells cancer, that proves that a drug can be better than another one. In the case of afatinib and erlotinib, there a more benefits with afatinib. In general, it also depends on the insurance company and other factors to see which agent to use.

The toxicity is different, some of them are less toxic than others, but the effects are only skin rash and diarrhea. In general, the more powerful drugs like afatinib, which are irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors, give more rashes and diarrhea, so physicians think that it’s better and they use it more. In contrast, there are other doctors that think the side effects are not good, so they don’t use them, especially in elderly patients that cannot tolerate skin rashes or diarrhea. As you can see, we use toxicity to see which drugs are going to be used in each case.

Video Language

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Image
Trial data ASCO 2024
Video
In this video series from ASCO 2024, Drs. Aakash Desai and Fauwzi Abu Rous discuss trial dates and clinical data as presented at the 2024 ASCO. To watch the complete playlist, click here.         
Image
Bladder Cancer Video Library 2024
Video
Dr. Petros Grivas discusses intravesical treatment for patients with nonmuscle invasive, or early-stage, bladder cancer, the importance of participating in clinical trials for bladder cancer, combination therapy options for patients with metastatic or incurable bladder cancer, and the importance of family history of cancer and discussing that history with your doctor.
Image
Case Based Panel
Video
The panel discusses treatment options for a patient diagnosed with EGFR Exon 19 Deletion NSCLC and examines data from the Laura Trial, a patient with a smoking history and diagnosis of small cell lung cancer, and how the Adriatic Study factors into decisions, and a patient with NSCLC adenocarcinoma, and a EGFR Exon 21 L858R Alteration, and how data from the Flaura 2 Trial can impact treatment decisions.

Forum Discussions

Hi elysianfields and welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry to hear about your father's progression. 

 

Unfortunately, lepto remains a difficult area to treat.  Recently FDA approved the combo Lazertinib and Amivantamab...

Hello Janine, thank you for your reply.

Do you happen to know whether it's common practice or if it's worth taking lazertinib without amivantamab? From all the articles I've come across...

Hi elysianfields,

 

That's not a question we can answer. It depends on the individual's health. I've linked the study comparing intravenous vs. IV infusions of the doublet lazertinib and amivantamab...

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
I could not find any info on…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Hi elysianfields,

 

That's…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Hello Janine, thank you for…
By elysianfields on
EGFR
By happybluesun on