Welcome!
Welcome to the new CancerGRACE.org! Explore our fresh look and improved features—take a quick tour to see what’s new.
Dr. West,
I have read your articles from 2007 regarding follow up guidelines for lung cancer. Would you please let me know what your current follow up guidelines are for Stage 1 BAC. Have there been any new national guidelines published since 2007?
About 1 year ago you had written that you were contemplating doing online consults and was wondering if this service is currently being offered.
Welcome to the new CancerGRACE.org! Explore our fresh look and improved features—take a quick tour to see what’s new.
Reply # - October 24, 2013, 02:23 PM
Reply To: 2013 follow up guidelines for lung cancer
Hi ds, I hope you're feeling well. Good to read of your NED. I just want to let you know we're here and we'll make sure Dr. West sees your thread today.
Best of luck on continued NED,
Janine
Reply # - October 24, 2013, 09:06 PM
Reply To: 2013 follow up guidelines for lung cancer
The guidelines offer a lot of latitude. For stage I BAC, I generally do a scan every 6 months out to 3 or 4 years post-surgery, then switch to an annual scan. stage for stage, BAC tends to have a better prognosis than other NSCLC subtypes, so while I often scan every 4 months for most other patients with resected NSCLC, I favor a 6 month schedule for resected early stage BAC and other cancers that have characteristics that lead me to expect them to be indolent.
I had developed a full company to do online consults, but my employer took the position that it would compete with my clinical practice with them. Unfortunately, I needed to leave it behind in order to keep my day job.
-Dr. West
Reply # - October 25, 2013, 05:55 AM
Reply To: 2013 follow up guidelines for lung cancer
Dr. West
Do you have an end point for annual CT's in indolent lung cancer's?
In your response you said " while I often scan every 6 months for most other patients with resected NSCLC, I favor a 6 month schedule for respected early stage BAC and other cancers that have characteristics that lead me to expect them to be indolent. "
Is there a typo? Do you mean every 6 months for indolent lung cancers and every 6 months for most other patients with resected NSCLC?
Sorry to hear about your online consult service not going forward. I think it would have been very successful and very beneficial to those of us who are not in your area but want your great advise.
Deborah
Reply # - October 25, 2013, 06:24 AM
Reply To: 2013 follow up guidelines for lung cancer
Deborah,
Based on what he's written previously, he probably meant 4 months for most NSCLC:
"...my approach is to generally do a CT every 4 months in the first year, then every 6 months until 4 years out, and then annually. As Dr. Pinder noted, the value of these scans is partly to monitor for recurrence and partly to screen for a possible new cancer, since someone who has developed a prior lung cancer is at higher risk for a new one than someone who has never developed a lung cancer before.
"My approach is still potentially modified by the circumstances of an individual patient. For instance, for the few patients I follow after surgery for a resected stage IA NSCLC, I generally do scans every 6 months instead of every 4 months in the first year, because the risk of recurrence is so much lower." - http://cancergrace.org/forums/index.php?topic=1721.msg10153#msg10153
You can also read Dr. Gadgeel's post on follow-up here: http://cancergrace.org/lung/2008/08/10/fu-after-resection/
JimC
Forum moderator
Reply # - October 25, 2013, 10:20 PM
Reply To: 2013 follow up guidelines for lung cancer
Yes, it should have been 4 months for less indolent cancers in the first year, 6 months for many BACs and other cancers that appear to be indolent. I'll edit that.
-Dr. West