Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

Dr. Jack West is a medical oncologist and thoracic oncology specialist who is the Founder and previously served as President & CEO, currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Global Resource for Advancing Cancer Education (GRACE)

 

Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: An Introduction
Author
Howard (Jack) West, MD

I'm going to cover the general concepts of management of brain metastases, a subject that is still evolving because of our growing technology, particularly with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), commonly referred to as gamma knife. In many cases, our practice has moved a bit ahead of the data. We'll start with some general issues and then, over several posts, cover issues from surgery to radiation to medical therapy.

Brain metastases are very common, somewhere in the range of 150,000 - 170,000 patients with cancer who develop brain metastases each year in the US, which makes it the most common complication of cancer (abstract here). Lung cancer is the most common underlying cause, accounting for something in the range of half or a bit more of those cases (abstract here). In SCLC, more than 10% of patients have brain metastases at the time of diagnosis, and more than 50% of those patients with SCLC who aren't treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) will develop brain mets later, generally within two years of diagnosis (abstract here). In NSCLC, PCI has also been considered due to the fact that up to up to half of the total number of people with NSCLC develop brain metastases as well at some point; this has become a common "sanctuary site" for disease to recur first or recur only after treatment for stage I - III disease.

The location where brain metastases end up is proportional to where blood flows throughout the brain. That is, 80% of brain metasatasis are deposited in the large cerebral hemispheres, 15% in the cerebellum that sits at the base of the head, and 5% are in the brainstem (abstract here). People develop symptoms when the tumor cells grow and lead to inflammation and surrounding edema (swelling) in the area of the brain, increasing pressure. The symptoms people develop relate to the neurologic function of the area where the metastasis has developed, so if it's an area of motor control for the left arm, that's what people will notice, while the cerebellum controls balance, so metastases there lead to gait unsteadiness and falls. The most common symptom related to new brain metastases is a headache, which occurs in around 25-50% of patients, often due to the increased pressure in the brain/skull from the swelling (abstract here). It's also common to see confusion and/or forgetfulness, focal weakness, such as in an extremity, seizures, imbalance with walking, vision changes or less, difficulty with articulating speech, and sensation changes (numbness, etc.).

On exam, more than half of patients have areas of detectable weakness or mental status changes, but the changes can be quite subtle, and it has been estimated that up to 30% of cases may not be detected (abstract here).

Head/brain scans with CT or MRI are the way that the vast majority of brain metastases are detected (or confirmed if strongly suspected). Given the high frequency of brain metastases in SCLC in particular, current guidelines for SCLC or a tumor that is a mix of SCLC and NSCLC include an MRI of the brain as part of the initial workup. Recommendations for head imaging in NSCLC are more variable and controversial, with more consensus that stage III, possibly stage II NSCLC patients being considered for curative therapy undergo head imaging before pursuing aggressive curative therapy. There are not clear recommendations favoring brain imaging for earlier stage patients who have no symptoms suggestive of neurologic problems. Although head imaging for patients with metastatic disease else where has not been routine practice previously, standards are now changing for patients in whom avastin is being considered, because this agent is not recommended for patients with brain metastases due to concern for increased risk for intracranial (inside the skull) bleeding around brain metastastases, which is often fatal. Unsuspected brain metastases can be seen in somewhere in the range of 10-15% of asymptomatic patients with metastatic NSCLC, so most oncologists will check rather than presume an asymptomatic patient has no brain metastases.

There is little to no question that head MRIs are superior to CT scans in detecting brain metastases. MRI scans detect a greater number of lesions and defines the location more readily, and they are also better at detecting spread to the meninges, the lining around the brain (and spinal cord). Here is the appearace of a couple of MRI images of a patient of mine who was having increasing confusion and difficulty with his balance (and golf game, which is what he really cared about):

Brain mets MRI

PET scans are also incorporated routinely in the initial staging of patients with lung cancer. However, PET scans are not ideal for detecting brain metastases because the brain has a high baseline uptake of glucose (we hope). One study comparing PET scans to head MRIs showed that PET scans detected only 61% of the lesions detected by MRI (abstract here). Therefore, while a very large proportion of patients with lung cancer will undergo a PET or combined PET/CT scan in their staging workup, we don't feel confident that this addresses the question of whether there are brain metastases, and an MRI to answer the question is generally recommended if the level of suspicion for brain metastases is high enough.

We'll cover the prognostic and treatment issues in the next few posts. Brain metastases are a big, complex problem, so we'll need to cover the topic in some depth to really do it justice.

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Article
Advance directives are a powerful way to take control of healthcare choices. These documents allow you to outline preferences for medical care and specify end-of-life wishes. These documents can also be a way to appoint loved ones who you would like to help with these decisions, such as a healthcare proxy (someone to make decisions on your behalf, if you cannot). As cancer treatments can involve aggressive treatments and/or complex medical management, having advance directives ensures that your desires regarding treatment options and end-of-life care are clearly communicated. 
Image
2024-25 patient perspectives header
Article
Tell your story and help us help others! Apply online now for this paid opportunity. This program gives a voice to those who have experience in participating in a clinical trial for a cancer diagnosis. Your voice helps to educate and advocate for others who are in or who may be considering a clinical trial.  We want to hear from you!
Image
Foro de Pacientes de Terapias Dirigidas de Cáncer de Pulmón
Video
¡El vídeo completo bajo demanda está disponible para verlo!

Forum Discussions

Hi elysianfields and welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry to hear about your father's progression. 

 

Unfortunately, lepto remains a difficult area to treat.  Recently FDA approved the combo Lazertinib and Amivantamab...

Hello Janine, thank you for your reply.

Do you happen to know whether it's common practice or if it's worth taking lazertinib without amivantamab? From all the articles I've come across...

Hi elysianfields,

 

That's not a question we can answer. It depends on the individual's health. I've linked the study comparing intravenous vs. IV infusions of the doublet lazertinib and amivantamab...

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
I could not find any info on…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Hi elysianfields,

 

That's…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Hello Janine, thank you for…
By elysianfields on
EGFR
By happybluesun on