Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

Dr. Jack West is a medical oncologist and thoracic oncology specialist, and Executive Director of Employer Services at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, CA.

New FDA Approval for Zykadia (ceritinib) for ALK-Positive NSCLC: Why I Think It's a Poor Choice for Initial Treatment
Tue, 05/30/2017 - 17:11
Author
Howard (Jack) West, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Medical Oncology, Executive Director, Employer Services, Founder, President and CEO of GRACE

The FDA just approved a new therapy for the approximately 4% of patients with NSCLC who have the molecular marker known as an ALK rearrangement. The agent Zykadia (ceritinib), a "second generation" ALK inhibitor that is more effective than Xalkori (crizotinib) in lab models of ALK-positive NSCLC, and the new approval was for Zykadia as first line treatment for ALK-positive lung cancer, a setting where we have historically favored Xalkori since it was approved in 2011. . Despite the FDA approval for ceritinib, I don’t believe it should be favored as a first line therapy for ALK-positive patients. Why would I not favor it?

First, the comparator arm for ASCEND-4, the study on which the approval is predicated, to which Zykadia was compared, was standard doublet chemotherapy. This is a treatment approach known to be inferior to the current appropriate standard of Xalkori, which has already been clearly shown to have been superior to doublet chemotherapy in efficacy for this population.  This trial was designed to be positive by using an inappropriately low bar.

Second, the efficacy measure for benefit was a progression-free survival (PFS) of 16.6 months with Zykadia, which is better than chemo (8 months) and also better than we can expect for Xalkori (10-11 months), but it’s not better than we should expect for Xalkori followed by a second generation ALK inhibitor (typically 7-12+ months, with Zykadia at the low end of that spectrum).  We can’t anticipate that patients with acquired resistance to Zykadia will respond to other second generation ALK inhibitors, to which there is a greater probability of cross-resistance than after Xalkori, so that 16.6 month median PFS is actually a low number compared to the anticipated result from Xalkori followed by a better second generation ALK inhibitor.

Third, first line Zykadia on the ASCEND-4 trial was associated with very significant toxicity, especially GI, that far exceeded the chemotherapy arm in most non-hematologic toxicities, and the toxicity is remarkably greater than that expected with other second generation ALK inhibitors (or Xalkori, as a first generation ALK inhibitor).  Though some might argue that you can achieve comparable efficacy with lower toxicity by using a lower dose of ceritinib, that is a presumption that can’t be made: you can’t focus on the data you like and obfuscate the data you don’t like from the trial you designed.  We can only see that Zykadia at 450-600 mg/day is truly effective and tolerable if a properly conducted trial demonstrates as much.

Finally, the right comparator for the future is actually not going to be chemotherapy or Xalkori, but rather Alecensa (alectinib), another second generation ALK inhibitor that has been shown to have strong activity in ALK-positive activity and currently approved for Xalkori-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC. The global phase III ALEX trial is reportedly positive for a significant PFS benefit over Xalkori, while also being well tolerated (unlike Zykadia) and good control in the CNS (like Zykadia).  If the results of the global ALEX trial are anywhere near the remarkable results of the similarly designed but smaller and Japanese-only J-ALEX trial, specifically if the PFS with Alecensa exceeds about 20 months, it will not only be far superior to the results with Zykadia but will be better than we could necessarily expect from a sequential approach starting with Xalkori.  We’ll need to see the actual results, which will be reported at ASCO on 6/6/17, but I strongly suspect that Xykadia will barely have the opportunity to serve as a momentary placeholder for alectinib as a new first line standard of care for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Forum Discussions

Hi JW and welcome to Grace. I'm sorry you're going through this but hopefully and probably this isn't cancer. There is so much going on anatomically in that area that the...

Thanks Janine! I really appreciate your feedback. Had the CT and it came back all clear, huge relief! Going the physical therapy route which has already made a big difference. Root...

That is fantastic J_W! We really appreciate your follow-up. So many people find us through the same route you've taken/pinched nerve and like people with a cancer diagnosis it's important to...

Hi and welcome to Grace. I'm so sorry about your mom's situation, it's very complicated and not at all reasonable for us to comment on all that is being taken into...

Hi Scruboak, I will ask Dr. West to comment, it may be tomorrow. He's an expert in the field and will have thoughtful input. The fact that it was caught and...

I asked Dr. West and he said that this is a question he can't answer, we don't have studies that give details that specific. He said to his knowledge, that this...

Thank you so much, Janine. It helps me to just chill overall.

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
That is fantastic J_W! We…
By JanineT Forum … on Thu, 05/26/2022 - 09:40
Thanks Janine! I really…
By JanineT Forum … on Wed, 05/25/2022 - 16:19
Hi JW and welcome to Grace. …
By JanineT Forum … on Mon, 05/16/2022 - 10:52
All's good
By JanineT Forum … on Sat, 05/14/2022 - 15:10