Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

Dr. Jack West is a medical oncologist and thoracic oncology specialist who is the Founder and previously served as President & CEO, currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Global Resource for Advancing Cancer Education (GRACE)

 

Single-Agent Erbitux Studies in NSCLC

Please Note: New Treatments Have Emerged Since this Original Post
Author
Howard (Jack) West, MD

Yesterday I reviewed a series of studies of the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetixumab, or Erbitux, combined with chemotherapy. Overall, these trials are modestly encouraging, without what I would consider to be a potential antagonistic effect when chemo and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like Iressa or Tarceva. However, we still don't have studies big enough to establish any role for erbitux. Today, I'll cover the very limited experience of single-agent Erbitux in advanced NSCLC.

Tom Lynch from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, who helped identify the EGFR mutation in 2004, presented the first single-agent erbitux results in NSCLC, in 2004 (abstract here). He described a total of 33 patients with previously treated (chemo, not EGFR inhibitor) advanced NSCLC. All patients were treated with weekly IV erbitux, with cycles defined as a four week period. He found that 2 patients responded, and the total "disease control" rate, which is responses and stable disease together, was 27%. Reasonable, not particuarly remarkable. All of these patients were positive for EGFR by immunohistochemistry (abbreviated as IHC, it means staining of the EGFR protein on tumor cells, which is not very clearly associated with doing well or poorly on EGFR inhibitors like iressa and tarceva). Interestingly, neither of the patients who had significant tumor shrinkage had an EGFR mutation, which is found in the part of the EGFR molecule on the inside of the cell that iressa and tarceva block, called the tyrosine kinase portion. So EGFR monoclonal antibody activity isn't necessarily associated with the EGFR mutations we've often seen in major iressa or tarceva responders. The side effects were pretty much as expected, primarily rash, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting. The longer follow-up on this work (abstract here), with twice as many patients, was presented by Dr. Rogerio Lilenbaum, our friend and a real lung cancer expert in Miami, who has been mentioned in some prior posts. Almost all (60 of 66) of the patients had EGFR positive tumors by IHC, the median age was 63, and two thirds of the patients were men. The results were about the same as previously, with a response rate of only 4.5%, and about 35% with at least stable disease. About 42% of the patients on the trial were alive a year after starting the trial, and one patient was on it without progression for 22 months and counting when the results were reported. Tissue was available for two of the 3 responders, neither of whom had an EGFR mutation, while the three patients found to have a mutation did not respond to erbitux. Rash, fatigue/malaise, nausea/vomiting, infusion reactions, and mouth sores (stomatitis) were the most common side effects. Sadly, that's pretty much what we know about erbitux as a single-agent in advanced NSCLC right now. This work didn't generate a lot of excitement, but it did suggest that the people who respond to the oral EGFR TKIs aren't necessarily the same people who may respond to IV EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Because of that, one of the potential ideas for managing patients who respond very well initially to EGFR TKIs and then show slow progression after a prolonged response is to add an agent like erbitux, or possibly avastin, to the EGFR TKI. But in the meantime, the results with single-agent erbitux haven't been impressive enough to move ahead in larger trials.

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Image
Trial data ASCO 2024
Video
In this video series from ASCO 2024, Drs. Aakash Desai and Fauwzi Abu Rous discuss trial dates and clinical data as presented at the 2024 ASCO. To watch the complete playlist, click here.         
Image
Bladder Cancer Video Library 2024
Video
Dr. Petros Grivas discusses intravesical treatment for patients with nonmuscle invasive, or early-stage, bladder cancer, the importance of participating in clinical trials for bladder cancer, combination therapy options for patients with metastatic or incurable bladder cancer, and the importance of family history of cancer and discussing that history with your doctor.
Image
Case Based Panel
Video
The panel discusses treatment options for a patient diagnosed with EGFR Exon 19 Deletion NSCLC and examines data from the Laura Trial, a patient with a smoking history and diagnosis of small cell lung cancer, and how the Adriatic Study factors into decisions, and a patient with NSCLC adenocarcinoma, and a EGFR Exon 21 L858R Alteration, and how data from the Flaura 2 Trial can impact treatment decisions.

Forum Discussions

Hi elysianfields and welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry to hear about your father's progression. 

 

Unfortunately, lepto remains a difficult area to treat.  Recently FDA approved the combo Lazertinib and Amivantamab...

Hello Janine, thank you for your reply.

Do you happen to know whether it's common practice or if it's worth taking lazertinib without amivantamab? From all the articles I've come across...

Hi elysianfields,

 

That's not a question we can answer. It depends on the individual's health. I've linked the study comparing intravenous vs. IV infusions of the doublet lazertinib and amivantamab...

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
I could not find any info on…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Hi elysianfields,

 

That's…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Hello Janine, thank you for…
By elysianfields on
EGFR
By happybluesun on