One of the core issues in managing advanced NSCLC is second line chemotherapy, which was established as improving survival several years ago. This video presentation provides a brief summary of the work that led to the common use of chemotherapy in previously treated patients. Most typically, this is taxotere (docetaxel) or alimta (pemetrexed), and this presentation describes why we focus most commonly on these chemo agents.

[powerpress]

Several weeks ago, I described the results of a survey I sent out to several colleagues who are lung cancer experts around the country, asking how they would manage a case of a newly diagnosed Caucasian never-smoking patient with advanced NSCLC, adenocarcinoma, and asymptomatic subcentimeter brain metastases, treated with whole brain RT before starting systemic therapy.

One of the key points that has been established in first line treatment of advanced NSCLC is that two drug chemotherapy is superior to one drug chemo. Several trials from a decade ago showed that a two drug "platinum doublet" led to a longer overall survival than either a platinum alone (typically cisplatin at the time that these trials were performed) or another agent, such as paclitaxel alone.

A few weeks ago I described a blood test for predicting survival after getting an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor that is just becoming commercially available. This is called the Veristrat test and from company called Biodesix.

This pilot video slide presentation covers the development of our current standards for first line chemotherapy to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

[powerpress]

These series will be called GRACEcasts (love it?), and we're in the process of developing a bunch of audio interviews with experts for an audio channel, and multiple video presentations, which are going to be about 10 minutes each, just little chapters at one time.

An interesting trial presented at ASCO 2008 came out of Japan, asking the question of whether there is an advantage to continuing first line platinum-based doublet chemo for up to six cycles or whether it might be better to give just three cycles and then switch from chemo right to the EGFR inhibitor iressa in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC (abstract here).

Over the past several weeks, coincident with the opening of a new large clinical trial and some publicity associated with that, several people have asked me here about a lung cancer vaccine called Lucanix (full name belagenpumatucel-L, so a near guarantee that nobody will call this anything but Lucanix). My initial response was that I knew essentially nothing about it and more or less implied that there must not be much to it if there was really no buzz about it within the lung cancer community.

I doubt there is a group of lung cancer patients more common but less well studied than the substantial subset of frail and/or very elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. While “elderly” patients, usually defined as age 70, have been evaluated as a subset of the population in larger studies and even been the subject of specific studies just for the elderly, most of this work has shown that fit elderly patients do as well as younger patients getting the same aggressive treatment.

We’ve been following sorafenib (nexavar), a multi-kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic activity (see prior post). This oral agent, which is already approved as an effective treatment for cancers of the liver and kidney.

Within the lung cancer community, the biggest story from the ASCO meeting was the long-awaited plenary session presentation (abstract here) of the FLEX trial of chemo with or without the EGFR monoclonal antibody Erbitux (cetuximab) that we knew was statistically significantly positive for an overall survival benefit as far back as September of last year (see