The question of whether we should routinely have advanced NSCLC patients with a response or stable disease after four cycles of first line chemotherapy transition to immediate maintenance therapy or be watched during a treatment break has been the subject of several clinical trials and debates in the lung cancer community over the past couple of years.

For many years, chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC had been limited to the use of “doublet” (two-drug) therapy using different combination regimens that were overall found to have very similar outcomes, but with different toxicity (side effect) profiles. Attempts to add a third chemotherapy agent for a triplet regimen, and numerous attempts to add different targeted-therapy agents, had dismal success. Not only did most of the combinations fail to improve on the survival outcomes, they increased the number of side effects compared with doublet chemotherapy alone.

Maintenance therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer was certainly the big theme this year in the lung cancer presentations. Let's start with the Alimta data. Dr. West has outlined earlier results of this study after this data was presented at the 2008 ASCO meeting.

The ASCO meeting I'm at right now is so busy that there really isn't time to write a new post (though I'm still "tweeting from the meeting"). Though the talk show hows just air re-runs of old shows when they're on vacation, I'm trying to continue to add new content to the website during this time (and it's about as far from a vacation as anyone has in Orlando).

The ASCO meeting I'm at right now is so insanely busy during the days and nights that it's next to impossible to carve out the time to write posts during the meeting. While the talk show hosts just show re-runs while they're on vacation, we're at least going to put up some new content, even if it's from work previously done (and this is far from a vacation).

Among the many challenges in clinical oncology is the fact that a very significant proportion of our patients are quite a bit more debilitated than the vast majority of patients in clinical trials that test our anti-cancer therapies. Approximately a third of the patients with advanced NSCLC have what would be considered a poor performance status (PS) of 2 or 3 (0 to 5 scale, 0 being asymptomatic, and 5 being dead), but they are extremely under-represented on our clinical trials.

There has been quite a lot of discussion recently about the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), erlotinib (Tarceva) and gefitinib (Iressa). Recently however the final results of the FLEX trial were published in The Lancet, bringing attention back to one of the antibodies against EGFR, cetuximab (Erbitux). Dr.

This week I happened to see a man in my clinic who I had first met at the time of his diagnosis with metastatic lung cancer more than five years ago. He's from another part of Washington state, and this was his first time back with me to revisit treatment options.

Over the past couple of years a few large trials have emerged that have shown some value in switching patients to a new chemotherapy after, for instance, four cycles of first line chemo for advanced NSCLC, vs. an otherwise very reasonable alternative of stopping treatment in non-progressing patients and following them off of treatment, until progression.

With special thanks to Harvey and Bernice Janssen for providing support to make it possible, I'm pleased to post a new video presentation on the topic of Timing the Transition to Maintenance/Second Line Chemotherapy for Advanced NSCLC. We can expect new information to emerge in the coming months and years, but here is the current snapshot of what we know, along with a little describing what I think (noted as such), about this important topic today.

[powerpress]

For those accessing the audio only version (mp3), the accompanying figures are here, as well as a transcript: