Hi,
Viewed the GRACE video on liquid biopsy. It sounds like a preferred method than tissue biopsy. With any laboratory test, I would imagine there is a possibility of false positive and false negative.
In my simplistic view, the more of what one hopes to detect through the blood sample the more likely of detection and vice versa. If there is evident of progression through many locations, I would think there is higher likelihood of detecting T790 mutation and fewer locations of progression, less likelihood of detecting T790 mutation.
How sensitive is the liquid biopsy to detect T790 mutation?
Is the prevailing practice to use liquid biopsy as the first line of T790 detection?
Thx
Reply # - December 2, 2015, 07:07 PM
In general, the 'liquid
In general, the 'liquid biopsy' has a high reliability if it is positive. If it detects a mutation, that is a useful finding.
However it has a lower sensitivity compared to a tumor biopsy. So, a negative result is not particularly informative.
Mind you, I'm not addressing the question of change over time. Just a one-time liquid biopsy.
Reply # - December 2, 2015, 09:53 PM
Thank you Dr. Creelan!
Thank you Dr. Creelan!