treatment suggestion for elderly NSCLC Stave 4 - 1248966

colin
Posts:2

Hi,

First of all, my apology if similar / same question had been posted on this topic. I browsed thru some of the posting but didn't exactly see a similar situation.

I was refered to CancerGrace when I posted a question to www.inspire.com. here is what I've posted:

My father has Stage IV adenocarcinoma, spread to the bone. He is 75 years old. Due to his advanced age, he has refused chemo. He had 10 rounds of radiotherapy to ease the pain as well as 2 rounds of Zometa, but had decided not to proceed with the 3rd. Oncologist tested him for EGFK as well as ALK. Unfortunately, both came back negative. So, we’re back to square one after more than 2 months. As chemo is not an option for him, we do not know what other treatments he can try.

Am wondering if there are any other treatment that we can explore.

thanks in advance

Colin.

Forums

JimC
Posts: 2753

Hi Colin,

I'm sorry to hear of your father's diagnosis. I hope that the radiation and Zometa has eased his pain. As you probably know, the three main types of treatment for lung cancer are surgery, radiation and chemo or other drugs. With stage IV NSCLC, I assume there is no role for surgery, except perhaps if he has bone mets or other tumors which are causing pain or other symptoms which need to be addressed for his comfort. That leaves chemo, which he has rejected, or other drugs such as the oral medication Tarceva. Even though he is EGFR negative, Tarceva can provide a more modest benefit than it usually provides to patients with an activating EGFR mutation. Tarceva is generally better tolerated than most types of chemo, although some patients do have quite a bit of difficulty with it.

I understand that he may not be interested in chemo because of his age, but the side of effects of chemo are better controlled than they used to be, so the current thinking is that it can be appropriate regardless of a patient's age. The more important factor is "performance status" which is a measure of the overall health of a patient aside from his cancer. A generally healthy 75 year old may tolerate chemo better than a less fit younger patient. Also, there are newer drugs which are better tolerated than some of the older ones. For lung cancer, a good example is Alimta (Pemetrexed), which many patients find easier to handle compared to other chemo drugs. And although the standard first-line treatment for lung cancer is a two- or three-drug combination including a platinum agent, often older or more frail patients are given just a single drug in an effort to make treatment more tolerable. So he may want to discuss such options with his oncologist.

My thoughts are with you and him for a good treatment plan.

JimC
Forum moderator

Dr West
Posts: 4735

Jim has provided a terrific summary. I agree that Tarceva (erlotinib) may still provide some benefit, even if he doesn't have an EGFR mutation. And then the key concept is that being 75 absolutely doesn't preclude him from necessarily receiving chemotherapy. If he's very debilitated, chemo could be a choice that isn't likely to provide much benefit, but the median age for a newly diagnosed person with lung cancer in the US is right around 70-71 -- we routinely treat fit 75 year-olds with standard chemo, including combinations of drugs, and they can often do very well. The overwhelming evidence supports the idea that chronologic age is less important than functional age.

Here's a link to a podcast that provides a very good summary of the field of treating lung cancer in elderly patients:

http://cancergrace.org/lung/2011/10/03/lilenbaum-on-lc-in-elderly/

Good luck.

-Dr. West

colin
Posts: 2

Hi Jim and Dr. West,

Thanks for your encouraging words. If I had known of Cancergrace much earlier, I would have been able to give a more objective advice to my father.

He has since decided to give chemo a go, and doctor is prescribing an oral chemo (tegafur).

thanks again

Colin