Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

Dr. Jack West is a medical oncologist and thoracic oncology specialist who is the Founder and previously served as President & CEO, currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Global Resource for Advancing Cancer Education (GRACE)

 

Have Your Practices Changed Regarding Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Extensive Stage SCLC Patients?
gracevideo
Author
Howard (Jack) West, MD

Drs. Ben Solomon, Leora Horn, & Jack West discuss whether the data highlighting cognitive deficits from whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases should change our recommendations for prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI).

 

 

Transcript

Dr. West:  What about patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer who don’t have brain metastases, and complete four or six cycles of chemotherapy, and still have a good performance status? We’ve seen conflicting results on the potential value of prophylactic cranial irradiation — some suggesting a significant survival benefit, some even suggesting harm, and a greater concern, I would say, throughout cancer, and certainly lung cancer, about cognitive side effects of brain radiation. So, where does that leave you in terms of what you say to a patient who’s finishing first line therapy and still has a good performance status; Leora?

Dr. Horn:  So, I do talk to patients about the data being fairly controversial. In my clinical experience, the patients who don’t get PCI — many of them do end up with brain metastases at some point.

Dr. West:  It’s very common in small cell.

Dr. Horn:  Yeah, and so I tell them it may delay it, or if it’s not something you want to do, we don’t have to do it at this point. But, I do worry about those patients that we’re not doing PCI [for] anymore, because the Japanese studies suggested, you know, maybe we shouldn’t.

Dr. Solomon:  Yeah, so one of the things that I’ve wondered about that Japanese study, which might make it different from the Slotman study, was the Japanese patients had pretty rigorous imaging of their brain, even prior to entry onto the study, so that study, to my recollection, gave PCI to patients who didn’t have brain metastases, and I wonder whether that might be an explanation for the differences seen. So, again, we have the discussion about PCI with the concerns about neurocognitive effects, but I wonder whether an alternative in someone who doesn’t want to have PCI is to have a policy of CNS imaging — but that’s not yet supported by data, but it might be something to think about.

Video Language

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Online Community

Hi app.92,  Welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry this is late getting to you. And more sorry your mum is going through this.  It's possible this isn't a pancoast tumor even though...

A Brief Tornado.  I love the analogy Dr. Antonoff gave us to describe her presentation.  I felt it earlier too and am looking forward to going back for deeper dive.

Dr. Singhi's reprise on appropriate treatment, "Right patient, right time, right team".

While Dr. Ryckman described radiation oncology as "the perfect blend of nerd skills and empathy".  

I hope any...

My understanding of ADCs is very basic. I plan to study Dr. Rous’ discussion to broaden that understanding.

Here's the webinar on YouTube.  It begins with the agenda. Note the link is a playlist, which will be populated with shorts from the webinar on specific topics

An antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) works a bit like a Trojan horse. It has three main components:

  1. The antibody, which serves as the “horse,” specifically targets a protein found on cancer...

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Hi app.92,  Welcome to Grace…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Webinar OnDemand
By JanineT GRACE … on
My understanding of ADCs is…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Right patient, right time,…
By JanineT GRACE … on