Article and Video CATEGORIES
A novel agent called motexafin gadolinium (MGd), with a marketed name of Xcytrin, has been studied as a potential neuroprotectant as well as radiosensitizer that may allow patients with brain metastases to do better when it as added to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) than they would with WBRT alone. It is a molecule called a metallotexaphyrin, which forms stable complexes with large metal cations and accumulates preferentially in tumor cells (reference abstract here). It is readily detectable by MRI, and in fact some have suggested that no matter what else it may do, it could be a remarkably sensitive tool for picking up brain metastases. Here is an example of how good is is at identifying metastases on a brain MRI, and how well it localizes in brain tumor tissue:
It inhibits an enzyme called thioredoxin reductase, which can be overexpressed in lung cancer, in which it is associated with aggressive disease, tumor resistance, and worse survival. MGd generates reactive oxygen species by catalyzing the oxidation of several intracellular-reducing metabolites, which leads to radiosensitization (stronger effects of radiation)(abstract here).
In an early trial testing the value of WBRT with or without MGd (an IV drug given before each of 10 RT fractions over two weeks) for patients with brain metastases in 401 patients (abstract here), there was only a minimal, non-significant increase in median survival and actually an approximately one-month improvement in neurologic progression (8.3 months for WBRT alone, 9.5 months with MGd; not statistically significant). However, 251 of the patients on the trial had NSCLC, and among that subset, there was actually a statistically significant increase in time to neurologic progression, as assessed by a blinded, independent events review committee that did detailed neurologic testing (median 7.4 months for WBRT alone vs. median not reached for WBRT with MGd):
It did appear that the addition of MGd led to improved memory and overall neurologic function in patients with brian metastases from NSCLC. It's not clear why this effect is specific to NSCLC over SCLC, although it may be because patients with NSCLC can have a slower pace of disease and prolonged survival after treatment for brain mets. Regardless of the reason, the encouraging results thus far have been limited to brain metastases from NSCLC
In order to clarify this issue, Dr. Minesh Mehta, a radiation oncologist and expert on brain metastases at the University of Wisconsin who led the earlier trial, conducted a later trial that he presented at ASCO 2006 (abstract here). This study enrolled 554 patients with brain metastases from NSCLC from all around the world to receive WBRT with or without MGd, looking for a significant improvement in time to neurologic progression. There was an overall trend of favorable results for the folks who received MGd with WBRT, but it wasn't statistically significant:
Interestingly, though, the investigators noted that the patients from the US and Canada, who accounted for a little over half of those enrolled, were far more likely to start WBRT within just a few weeks after diagnosis than patients in Europe or Australia. The improvement in time to neurologic progression was striking and was actually statistically significant if they looked only at the patients who started WBRT within four weeks of diagnosis, or looking only at the patients diagnosed and treated in North America:
So this wasn't an unalloyed success, but there was certainly indications of value from MGd. At this point, this agent has not been approved by the FDA, and it is not commercially available. In the meantime, it would also be a great help in identifying brain metastases. We'll see if it becomes available as a new tool at some point.
Please feel free to offer comments and raise questions in our
discussion forums.
Forum Discussions
Hi Stan, It's good to hear your voice and know your cheesecakes are still making the rounds. Though I'm sure startling, I imagine some of those little pockets of the house...
Hi Rutbats, Welcome to GRACE and thanks for the kind words.
We can't say what you should or shouldn't do and I can't say why your RA doc made their...
Thank you very much for your quick answer, Janine.
I have an appointment with a pulmonologist in 10 days. I will summarize the conversation with him here, so that other people...
Glad to know you're moving forward with a pulmonologist. The more you know the better the conversation with your pulmonologist. Remember you can help your docs know what level their conversation...
Hi Terry, Welcome to Grace.
I saw this exact post somewhere else months back and the only response was to a lab. I hope that doesn't happen here, we don't allow...
Stan - Thank you once again for your kind words. Thank you as well for your donation. As you know, your donation helps us to exist and continue to fulfill our...