Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

When Will Patients with Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Get a Break?
Please Note: While this is Still Excellent Background Info, New Treatments and Procedures Have Emerged Since this Original Post
Author
Dr Sanborn

When one reviews the excitement that has been generated over the last several years in regards to the advancement of therapy for NSCLC, it becomes painfully apparent that patients with adenocarcinoma have reaped the greatest benefits, and patients with squamous cell lung cancer have been more or less left out in the cold. The addition of Avastin to doublet chemotherapy prolongs life for patients with non-squamous cell lung cancer, while patients with squamous cell lung cancers have an increased risk of life-threatening bleeding from the lungs. Although Tarceva can prolong survival for patients with advanced NSCLC of all histolologies that has grown after chemotherapy, patients with the greatest chance of benefit in the first-line or salvage setting (those with activating EGFR mutations) almost exclusively have adenocarcinoma. Alimta, a “traditional” chemotherapy drug with a much lower toxicity profile than most chemotherapy agents, was shown to be active in non-squamous cell lung cancers, and to have virtually no activity in squamous NSCLC. This caused Alimta to lose its indication for NSCLC of squamous cell histology. Recently, a new mutation has been identified for NSCLC, the EML4-ALK translocation. This translocation, much like the EGFR activating mutations, drives cancer cell function in a dependent fashion, and inhibition with a novel c-met and ALK inhibitor is showing promise in early clinical data. Again, this mutation occurs in patients with non-squamous cell lung cancers, more commonly in lifetime never smokers. So where is the drug for squamous cell lung cancer? Although squamous cell NSCLC is decreasing in frequency as adenocarcinoma of the lung becomes more common, squamous cell tumors are far from rare.

Figitumumab, also known as CP-751,871, is a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the insulin-like growth factor receptor. The results of a phase II study presented at ASCO 2008 were reviewed in a previous post. In this phase II trial figitumumab was tested in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with previously-untreated NSCLC. Of particular note in that study, 13 of 18 patients with squamous cell lung cancer had a response to the treatment, yielding a response rate of 72% (compared to 42% response rate with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone). In an update at ASCO 2009, an additional 56 patients with non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC treated with the triplet combination were reported to have a response rate of at least 53%. Toxicity in the phase II study included those expected with carboplatin and paclitaxel (neutropenia, fatigue, decreased appetite), as well as hyperglycemia (high blood sugar levels). The hyperglycemia is thought to be a class effect of these drugs. Here, hopefully, was our targeted agent for squamous NSCLC. Based upon the hopeful response rates above, Pfizer launched several phase III trials in NSCLC. These included a phase III study of figitumumab with carboplatin and paclitaxel for previously-untreated non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC; a first-line phase III study of figitumumab with cisplatin and gemcitabine for patients with previously-untreated “all-histology” NSCLC; and a phase III trial of Tarceva with or without figitumumab for relapsed non-adenocarcinoma. It was then disappointing news to hear that Pfizer has suspended accrual to the phase III study with carboplatin and paclitaxel due to an increase in toxicity (termed serious adverse events, which includes severe toxicities that result in hospitalization, life-threatening events, and deaths). Not much information is currently available, and this information is obtained from a bare-bones report on Reuters, as the Pfizer website does not have the press release listed. The phase III study with cisplatin and gemcitabine has not yet begun recruiting patients, while the salvage therapy trial with erlotinib is ongoing. We will look forward to hearing more specific information, and to see whether the toxicities seen will affect the other trials or the future of this agent in NSCLC. I fear that we will still be looking for the White Knight for squamous NSCLC.

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Article
Advance directives are a powerful way to take control of healthcare choices. These documents allow you to outline preferences for medical care and specify end-of-life wishes. These documents can also be a way to appoint loved ones who you would like to help with these decisions, such as a healthcare proxy (someone to make decisions on your behalf, if you cannot). As cancer treatments can involve aggressive treatments and/or complex medical management, having advance directives ensures that your desires regarding treatment options and end-of-life care are clearly communicated. 
Image
2024-25 patient perspectives header
Article
Tell your story and help us help others! Apply online now for this paid opportunity. This program gives a voice to those who have experience in participating in a clinical trial for a cancer diagnosis. Your voice helps to educate and advocate for others who are in or who may be considering a clinical trial.  We want to hear from you!
Image
Foro de Pacientes de Terapias Dirigidas de Cáncer de Pulmón
Video
¡El vídeo completo bajo demanda está disponible para verlo!

Forum Discussions

Hi Stan,

It's so good to hear you and yours are doing well and that you were able to spend time with both families for Thanksgiving.  I know it meant a...

Hi Stan!  It is good to hear from you -- I am so very happy you are doing well.  I agree with Janine that family and friends - our chosen family...

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Hey Bluebird,

I understand…
By JanineT GRACE … on
So good to hear from you Stan
By dbrock on
Hi Stan,

It's so good to…
By JanineT GRACE … on