Transcript

Here's a brief video I did for Swedish Medical Center that discusses the issue that a minority of lung cancers might not actually require intervention.

I've mentioned in posts in the past about the settings in which local therapy might be appropriate for someone even when we know the cancer is advanced/metastatic.  Here's a brief video that discusses some of these issues, including a situation in which the local treatment isn't specifically aimed at addressing a symptom, as is the usual reason for treating with local therapy for metastatic cancer, but is rather what I'd consider the "Get the Lead Runner" strategy:

[powerpress]

I'm interested in your thoughts.