Hidden Primary SCLC - 1273734

kevbrook
Posts:17

Hi,
My wife, aged 48, had some leg pain and after a number of tests it was found to be from SCLC. What puzzles us is that her Xray and CT scan of chest and abdomen are clear. The doctor tells us that we are seeing a secondary cancer and that a primary is hidden in the chest somewhere. He also tells us that this is not unusual, yet we can find very little on the internet about it. Are we looking at something quite unique? My wife has had very little in the way of respiratory symptoms but has suffered from fatigue and tiredness for the past 14 months, which was put down to menopause (although she hasn't hit the menopause yet). If you need me to provide more details please ask. Thank you.

Kev.

Forums

JimC
Posts: 2753

Hi Kev,

It's unusual to not be able to see the primary lung cancer tumor on a CT, but by no means unheard of, as you can see from this comment in a post by Dr. Pennell:

"If the primary tumor is fairly obvious such as a big lung, colon, or breast mass, then most of the time we have a good idea what it is before we even get the pathology report. But it isn’t always immediately obvious where the primary site is located. Some patients come in with metastases to the brain, bone, lung, and/or liver, but with no obvious primary, and then we really rely on that biopsy to help us decide what type of cancer this is." - http://cancergrace.org/lung/2009/04/04/dx-of-primary-tumor-with-oligonu…

Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for a small cell lung cancer which has spread to the bone, whether or not the primary tumor can be imaged, although if the bone metastasis is causing a great deal of pain or threatening a fracture of the bone, then focal radiation to that spot may also be used.

In the absence of a measurable primary, it may be difficult to judge the efficacy of chemotherapy, but if after a couple of cycles of chemo she is feeling better, and a follow-up scan shows nothing new, that will be a good indication that chemo is having its desired effect.

JimC
Forum moderator

kevbrook
Posts: 17

Thanks for having us on the site and even preemting follow on questions. We were wondering how we might know if treatment was working, what you have said sounds so obvious now. If the cancer is causing the fatigue should that lift too if the treatment is working?
Have a great day.

JimC
Posts: 2753

Hi Kev,

It's likely it will, although treatment itself can cause fatigue. The fatigue from chemo often can be worst in the first half of the cycle, lessening after that. So if you see that pattern, and overall your wife is feeling less fatigue in the last week of the chemo cycle than she is now, that's a good sign it's working.

JimC
Forum moderator

kevbrook
Posts: 17

Thant you for all these answers, I hope it is okay to ask all these questions. I have looked at my wife's report and the leg pain was due to small cell carcinoma not SCLC. The consultants talk of something being hidden in the chest led me to believe it was SCLC, he might have said it, I can't honestly remember. Now I know a bit more I have a few concerns. SCLC normally grows quickly, so shouldn't we have started on chemo already? We are waiting for an appointmentment for a bronchoscopy, but if nothing is on CT then what can he aim for? If it is SCLC and my wife has been ill for 14 months or so, surely it would have been picked up on the CT? Obviously we will ask the questions at our next appointment, but it will be better to be equipped with some knowledge to be able to question his responses. Thank you.

cards7up
Posts: 636

The biopsy shows where the cancer originated from, which is what it did in her case. Her biopsy shows lung primary without a primary tumor in the lung showing, This doesn't mean that there aren't cancer cells there, just that they're not large enough to form a tumor. But the biopsy showed it.
You see a consultant which means you're not in the US. If this is in fact SCLC, then I would think chemo would've been started ASAP. As you've already know, it can be aggressive. Why are they doing a bronch now? Has she had a PET scan and brain MRI? I would think if this is actually SC, they'd be moving to treatment as quickly as possible since you say she's been sick for over a year. This would not follow how SC progresses. I'd want a second opinion as well, but not knowing where you are other than not in the US, don't know what else to tell you. Wishing her all the best.
Take care, Judy
P.S I am a lung cancer survivor of almost 6 years and not a medical professional. My info is from personal experience and research. My Mom passed the year before I was diagnosed. She had ext SCLC and beginning to end for her was only 6 weeks.

JimC
Posts: 2753

Hi Kev,

I'm not sure I'm clear on your meaning when you say that "the leg pain was due to small cell carcinoma not SCLC", as those two terms tend to be used interchangeably. If it wasn't clear from the biopsy, then I can understand that further diagnostic procedures such as bronchoscopy may make sense.

It is true that SCLC tends to be aggressive, and would normally grow quickly over a 14 month period. But there seems to be enough doubt about the diagnosis to be certain that's what's going on. I would certainly want to clear that up with her doctor to find out if the biopsy pretty clearly pointed to SCLC, something else, or it was inconclusive.

JimC
Forum moderator

kevbrook
Posts: 17

Jim and Judy,
I am so grateful to you both for replying. We come from Holland but last year moved to the UK to be nearer our daughter. We moved as my wife was not feeling well and we thought that being closer to our daughter would help. She moved to London after University. Unfortunately we are still some distance away as London is very expensive to live. Although we speak good English we are a bit out of our depth with the technical medical terms and also the processes for treatment here. I now understand that small cell carcinoma and SCLC are one and the same, this explains some of the conversations we have had.
My wife has not had a PET or brain MRI. The biopsy report clearly states small cell carcinoma. On her CT scan it does say that it was “unremarkable” but also has a line saying “No significant lymphadenopathy is identified in the chest”. Does the use of the work “significant” mean that there is some “lymphadenopathy” but not enough to give a definite indication of disease? Could this be why they want to do the broncho procedure?
I gather that the UK use the word consultant to mean consulting physician and is still a medically qualified doctor with specific expertise in their field. We have been sent from orthopaedics specialist to respiratory specialist which is where we are at now.
hartelijk dank Kev

JimC
Posts: 2753

Hi Kev,

Thanks for the clarifications. As far as the statement regarding lymphadenopathy, I would not assign any significance to the choice of words. In viewing the images from a CT, a radiologist cannot identify a cancerous lymph node other than by noting that it is swollen (and lymph nodes can swell for a variety of reasons). The statement merely indicates that there was nothing seen on the scan which would suggest cancerous lymph nodes. The radiologist's statement leaves open the possibility that there may be slightly swollen nodes seen, but that is not significant with respect to a cancer diagnosis.

I'm still not certain of the reason for the bronchoscopy, and I would ask the respiratory specialist why it is needed if there is already a definitive diagnosis of SCLC.

JimC
Forum moderator

kevbrook
Posts: 17

Thank you for replying again Jim. I have tried to call the consultant but can only reach his secretary who is not permitted to discuss my wifes diagnosis with me. I will find out the reason for the bronchoscope, I assumed that it was to locate the tumor so that radiation treatment could be given. I must add that the doctor did not say this but I interpreted this as he spoke about radiation treatments immediately after telling us about the bronchoscope. We have a lot to learn on this, next time I want to try and record the conversation. I can't write in interpret what he is saying and write quick enough! You have a very good site here, thank you.

JimC
Posts: 2753

Kev,

That makes sense, but the location of the tumor would need to be visualized in order to plan the radiation treatments, as the beams are very precisely aimed.

JimC
Forum moderator