Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

Dr. Jack West is a medical oncologist and thoracic oncology specialist who is the Founder and previously served as President & CEO, currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Global Resource for Advancing Cancer Education (GRACE)

 

Estradiol Levels and Lung Cancer Outcomes
Author
Howard (Jack) West, MD

This work is still early, but it's been interesting to see a lab-based correlate emerge along with with the observation of women, and particularly older women, doing better in lung cancer studies (several prior posts here). Last year, the folks at Cell Therapeutics, Inc., analyzed results from their trials with Xyotax (post here), which demonstrated that their favorable results were seen in younger women. Estrogen may be very relevant to several biological processes related to lung cancer (reviewed in this post), so there is reason to believe that sex differences in lung cancer outcomes are plausible.

Results at ASCO this year were notable for a couple of presentations that noted a correlation of estradiol levels with lung cancer outcomes. Estradiol is the major form of estrogen in humans, the "female" hormone, although levels are present in men as well. The results for women under 60 vs. 60 and older in a couple of xyotax trials were broken down by estradiol levels. Women with lower estradiol levels did better regardless of their age, while those with higher estradiol levels did less well, again regardless of their age:

estradiol and age in women (Click to enlarge)

So age appears to be more of a surrogate for hormonal status than an independent prognostic factor, at least according to an early analysis.

It would be interesting, though, to see if estradiol levels were also prognostic in men, since men also have detectable levels. In fact, that was looked at in the Xyotax trials, and would you believe that the men with lower estradiol levels (below the median) had a significantly longer survival than the men with higher estradiol levels? Here's the figure for the results, among 318 of 583 men on the STELLAR-3 (carbo/taxol vs. carbo/xyotax) or STELLAR-4 trial (gemcitabine or navelbine vs. xyotax) who had serum samples available:

estradiol in men Note: Estradiol levels are measured differently than in the above curve in women, hence the different numbers (scale).

Unlike women on these xyotax trials, men didn't do better with xyotax regardless of their estradiol levels.

There are trials that are just now beginning to look into using anti-estrogen therapies like tamoxifen or faslodex (fulvestrant) in combination with tarceva or other anti-cancer strategies, to see whether they will confer the survival benefit that seems to be present for post-menopausal women to pre-menopausal women, or maybe even men. Right now, we haven't seen the results of these trials, but I'll be watching for more and will keep everyone posted if we learn more.

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Image
Patient Education Ambassadors 2023-24
Video
Drs. Matthew Kurian, Karan Jatwani, and Karine Tawagi discuss risk factors for developing prostate cancer, PSA test in prostate cancer screening, biopsies in prostate cancer, among other relevant information about prostate cancer. To watch the full playlist click here.  
Image
Patient Education Ambassadors 2023-24
Video
La Dra. Ivy Riano analiza las diversas opciones de tratamiento para pacientes con cáncer y analiza las diversas opciones de tratamiento para pacientes con cáncer. Para ver la lista completa de videos da click aquí.

Forum Discussions

Hi Revtoby, Welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry you and your wife are worried about cancer but we couldn't say whether or not your wife's leison is cancer no matter how much...

Canyil, I'm sorry your father and you are going through this. While we can't give urgent help we are her to help offer info and resources to help make the best...

Hello and welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry you're going through this worry.  It is normal to watch a small very slow-growing solid nodule with once-a-year CT scans.  Anything less than a...

Thanks you very much. So in summary the course of action taken suggested by lung specalist (re scan in 12 months) seems appropriate? And a PET at this stage is probably...

I can't say what is appropriate for you that's only something your professionals with all your information can do.  However, when someone has a solid nodule less than a cm that...

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Hi Mackensie,  I'm sorry…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Pencoast Tumor
By Mackensie31 on
Blue Sun, I'm glad your mom…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Good news
By happybluesun on