Article and Video CATEGORIES

Cancer Journey

Search By

Dr. Jack West is a medical oncologist and thoracic oncology specialist who is the Founder and previously served as President & CEO, currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Global Resource for Advancing Cancer Education (GRACE)

 

Watching Small Lung Lesions Do Nothing: "Ground Glass Opacities" Don't Progress Over Years If They're Watched, Not Resected
Author
Howard (Jack) West, MD

In one of my earliest posts about bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) (in the dark ages, pre-Twitter), I wrote on the subject of managing small BAC-type lesions, which tend to appear as small hazy areas called "ground glass opacities" (GGOs) and suggested that some of these cancers may be so indolent that they don't need to be treated, even if they have the word "carcinoma" in the diagnosis. (a representative GGO identified by arrow) Now there is a proposal to change BAC to "adenocarcinoma in situ", a pre-cancerous condition, reflecting the idea that these lesions have such a favorable prognosis that they shouldn't necessarily be put in the same category as invasive lung cancers (pure BAC is a non-invasive lesion that shouldn't be able to get into the bloodstream and spread outside of the lungs). And now, there's a new article out of Japan that describes the experience of patients with BAC and multiple GGOs, some of which were resected and some not very accessible and some just watched. It turned out that just watching seemed to be a pretty good strategy.

The article out of Korea was published in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology and describes the experience of 73 patients with pathology-proven BAC, among whom 23 had other small GGOs identified pre-operatively. They followed patients after surgery for a median of 40 months and found that none of the patients with one or more identified small GGOs (<1 cm was their limit) showed any growth of these lesions; most stayed the same, and a few lesions actually regressed (they may not have been BAC and could have been inflammation or infection). They certainly had no impact on survival. Though the results are limited by the relatively short follow-up (just over 3 years of follow-up doesn't mean people are out of the woods), they do suggest that it's reasonable to use a watch and wait approach, at least for GGOs (which don't have a solid component that suggests an invasive cancer) that are less than a centimeter (larger tumors are more likely to have some area(s) of invasiveness). I've had several patients in whom there was one or a few growing lesions, perhaps with a solid component, along with several tiny background nodules that you aren't sure how to manage. They may represent "multifocal BAC", but often these areas are too small and inaccessible to sample. This work suggests that it's appropriate to take your chances and ignore them. In Japan and some other parts of Asia, the surgery they do for small BAC lesions is typically a wedge resection or segmentectomy rather than a full lobectomy, and this work is consistent with the idea that if you're going to do surgery on small GGOs/proven BAC lesions, a complete lobectomy may remove far more good lung tissue than necessary. To me, this work really raises the question of whether surgery is doing anything of value at all (at least if there are any other lesions left behind), if these lesions can sit there and do nothing for years at a time, and there's only a finite amount of lung tissue someone can afford to lose to the scalpel or to disease (at some point in the future). While there is certainly a range of clinical behavior for BAC, I'm impressed with this evidence supporting a "less is more" approach and suggesting that these patients and their lesions may do well no matter what you do or don't do.

Next Previous link

Previous PostNext Post

Related Content

Image
Patient Education Ambassadors 2023-24
Video
  Dr. Gladys Rodriguez and Hannah Manella, RD, discuss addressing nutritional concerns of patients who are undergoing cancer care.  
Image
Head And Neck Cancer Program
Video
Drs. Shetal Patel, Siddharth Sheth, and Jared Weiss discuss the most recent advances in head and neck cancer treatment, including curable and incurable head and neck cancers, thyroid cancers, and HPV positive and negative cancers.  

Forum Discussions

Canyil, I'm sorry your father and you are going through this. While we can't give urgent help we are her to help offer info and resources to help make the best...

Hello and welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry you're going through this worry.  It is normal to watch a small very slow-growing solid nodule with once-a-year CT scans.  Anything less than a...

Thanks you very much. So in summary the course of action taken suggested by lung specalist (re scan in 12 months) seems appropriate? And a PET at this stage is probably...

I can't say what is appropriate for you that's only something your professionals with all your information can do.  However, when someone has a solid nodule less than a cm that...

A doctor wouldn't nor shouldn't suspect a pancoast tumor with the info you've given.  It's like being in Colorado and hearing hoof beats and assuming it is zebras and not horses. ...

Hello and welcome to Grace.  I'm sorry you're worrying about this but it probably isn't cancer. 

 

From Adenocarcinoma of the lung: from BAC to the future, "GGNs with diameter...

Recent Comments

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Canyil, I'm sorry your…
By JanineT GRACE … on
I can't say what is…
By JanineT GRACE … on
Thanks you very much. So in…
By razp on
A doctor wouldn't nor…
By JanineT GRACE … on