Article and Video CATEGORIES
Although Avastin has been approved for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, at this point it cannot be universally employed. Patients with squamous cancers account for something in the range of 30% of patients, while patients with brain metastases amount to about 10-15% of patients. Another 5-10% may have hemoptysis, or the symptom of coughing up blood, and many others are on therapeutic blood thinners for a history of blood clots or atrial fibrillation. The trial of Avastin in lung cancer (called ECOG 4599) also did not include patients who had a marginal performance status, defined as being able to care for oneself but not able to work, and patients moderately limited in how active they can be, whether due to fatigue or shortness of breath or other issues, account for a lot of patients in the real world. We also still have trouble predicting which patients will have bleeding complications that can be serious or even fatal, even if only patients who meet the eligibility criteria are given Avastin. We are somewhat concerned about the risk of bleeding in patients with cavitary lesions (with an empty space in the middle, shown below)
and those with central cancers near major blood vessels, but those patients would be eligible for Avastin according to the trial and the approval guidelines. Finally, while most oncologists expect that Avastin would give similar benefits if added to different chemo regimens, we don’t have proof of that yet, nor do we know with certainty that it is safe when combined with other chemo agents.
So trials are now being done to clarify whether Avastin can be given safely to patients with hemoptysis who have received radiation to treat that issue, and to patients who have squamous cancers who may have received prior treatment with radiation to minimize bleeding risk. Other trials are evaluating Avastin in patients with treated brain metastases. Multiple trials are carefully assessing whether the patients with central cancers or cavitating tumors are at significantly greater risk for bleeding, and also will clarify whether women show a benefit with Avastin outside of the ECOG trial. Multiple ongoing trials are combining Avastin with other chemo drugs to ensure that it is safe in other regimens.
Avastin is also being tested in first-line, untreated small cell lung cancer, combined with cisplatin and etoposide, a combination commonly used in this setting. Importantly, we know that the small cell trial, also being done by ECOG, has not needed to be closed early due to safety problems. This helps us understand more about Avastin and bleeding risks, since small cell lung cancers are almost always very central. Because there is apparently no obvious increased bleeding risk when Avastin has been given with small cell lung cancer, it suggests that central location may not be as important as squamous subtype.
In mesothelioma, the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (Gemzar) has been studied with and without Avastin. The trial has closed for new patients and we anxiously await the results, which could make the addition of Avastin to chemo an appealing option for mesothelioma as well.
One important large trial that Is being done in Europe and near completion is called the AVAIL trial. This one, also for patients who have advanced NSCLC and received no prior chemo, gives cisplatin and gemcitabine with or without Avastin. There are actually two different dose levels of Avastin being studied, including the higher dose used in the US trial by ECOG, and a lower dose that is half of the higher dose. When the AVAIL trial results are presented in the next year or so, we should clarify whether we need the higher dose, whether women get the same degree of benefit as men, and whether Avastin is as safe and beneficial, or perhaps better, than with carboplatin and taxol.
I am leading two national trials through the SouthWest Oncology Group (SWOG) that combine Tarceva (erlotinib) and Avastin, one for never-smokers with any lung adenocarcinoma, and the other for patients with BAC (can have smoked) that should become nationally available in the next few months. Most of the patients will probably get this as their first or second treatment, since Tarceva is often used very early for BAC and never-smokers because this agent appears to be so helpful for these patients.
Please feel free to offer comments and raise questions in our
discussion forums.
Forum Discussions
Hello Janine, thank you for your reply.
Do you happen to know whether it's common practice or if it's worth taking lazertinib without amivantamab? From all the articles I've come across...
Hi elysianfields,
That's not a question we can answer. It depends on the individual's health. I've linked the study comparing intravenous vs. IV infusions of the doublet lazertinib and amivantamab...
Hello Linda, my name is Alexandra Beneke, I'm the Outreach Manager for GRACE. Your willingness to share your experiences and knowledge with the cancer community is truly inspiring. Your dedication to...
Hi Bluebird, Welcome to GRACE. I'm sorry you're going through this scare and hope it's just inflammation or from an infection you didn't know you had.
A CT would be...
Radiation + Brain Operation has just been discarded due to high risk. They will double Tagrisso dosis and then wait to see if it works, then try traditional Chemo. I would...
Recent Comments
That's…
Hi elysianfields and welcome to Grace. I'm sorry to hear about your father's progression.
Unfortunately, lepto remains a difficult area to treat. Recently FDA approved the combo Lazertinib and Amivantamab...