Article and Video CATEGORIES

What is the role for the neuroprotective agent memantine in patients receiving whole brain radiation therapy for brain metastases? Dr. Vivek Mehta reviews current practices to minimize risk of cognitive problems.
Please feel free to offer comments and raise questions in our Discussion Forums.
Transcript
I see number of patients that are going to need whole brain radiation for multiple brain metastasis in the brain, and one of the questions that has come up recently is, “is there anything out there we can do to reduce the cognitive impairment that’s associated with whole brain radiation?”
Well, just a short while ago, we learned some really interesting, but preliminary, results on using a medicine called memantine. It’s actually a medicine that’s often used in Alzheimer's disease, but it was done in a study where patients who were receiving whole brain radiation either got this medication, or didn’t get this medication. The results of the study suggest that there may be a benefit in terms of preventing the onset of cognitive impairment if you get this medicine.
Now, this is one of the very first studies, and it’s a relatively small study — it probably needs to be duplicated with a larger number of patients, it probably needs to be done in more stringent fashion, to really see and tease out whether this really works. I’ll tell you that, from a radiation oncology community, there’s a fair bit of excitement about this, because we want to do anything we can to potentially reduce this particular complication, because, in the patients that get this disease and survive for a long period of time, we want to keep their mental status as high as possible.
In my clinic, when I see patients that bring this up, we often try to get this medication. One of the challenges that we have encountered is that insurance companies are not authorizing this for payment in this particular indication, and a medication, if you are buying it on your own, is awfully expensive.
So, we have not had as much success as we’d like, or the clinical experience in seeing patients truly benefit from this. It would be nice to see more studies, more data, and then convince the payers that this actually works, and that this should be moving into the standard of care. But I don’t think, today, that it’s something that we routinely offer to our patients because of these impediments.
Please feel free to offer comments and raise questions in our
discussion forums.
Forum Discussions
Hi Stan, It's good to hear your voice and know your cheesecakes are still making the rounds. Though I'm sure startling, I imagine some of those little pockets of the house...
Hi Rutbats, Welcome to GRACE and thanks for the kind words.
We can't say what you should or shouldn't do and I can't say why your RA doc made their...
Thank you very much for your quick answer, Janine.
I have an appointment with a pulmonologist in 10 days. I will summarize the conversation with him here, so that other people...
Glad to know you're moving forward with a pulmonologist. The more you know the better the conversation with your pulmonologist. Remember you can help your docs know what level their conversation...
Hi Terry, Welcome to Grace.
I saw this exact post somewhere else months back and the only response was to a lab. I hope that doesn't happen here, we don't allow...
Stan - Thank you once again for your kind words. Thank you as well for your donation. As you know, your donation helps us to exist and continue to fulfill our...